tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5507673653895812509.post5672321744276964074..comments2024-03-27T09:33:37.646+01:00Comments on Omnium: Wife of BathSean Jeatinghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08978285783271305489noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5507673653895812509.post-137769152125189292009-03-22T00:45:00.000+01:002009-03-22T00:45:00.000+01:00D.E.,nice an idea, isn't it? Even now, while writi...D.E.,<BR/>nice an idea, isn't it? Even now, while writing this, I find myself smiling again.<BR/><BR/>Claudia,<BR/>almost exactly what I thought. Sometimes<BR/><BR/>As for your third paragraph: Born (appr.) when Daffyd ap Gwilym was 23 and had just seven more years to write his poems, Chaucer had about 27 years more time than my favourite bard to meet women. Thus, you might not be wrong. :)Sean Jeatinghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08978285783271305489noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5507673653895812509.post-58784974053886765612009-03-20T13:02:00.000+01:002009-03-20T13:02:00.000+01:00The students did very well. Chosing Clint Mansel's...The students did very well. Chosing Clint Mansel's "Requiem for a Dream" as background music was genius. It kept the story flowing...<BR/><BR/>As for Chaucer, amazing that he would have known so well the complexity of a liberated woman's heart, body and soul, without having read first Betty Friedan's "Feminine Mystique".<BR/><BR/>'Nothing new under the sun' wrote the Ecclesiastes, long before Chaucer and Friedan were born. I'm sure he had met a few interesting wives when he was penning his wise sayings.Claudehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04307495672130972111noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5507673653895812509.post-72368267707768513762009-03-19T09:20:00.000+01:002009-03-19T09:20:00.000+01:00Very amusing!Very amusing!A Doubtful Egghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11865149869239061973noreply@blogger.com